Novelty Textiles Inc v. Pink Blush Maternity Inc et al
| Novelty Textiles Inc |
| Chris & Carol Apparel Inc, Does and Pink Blush Maternity Inc |
| 2:2014cv05893 |
| July 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| George H. Wu |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu: Upon Stipulation 34 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal. The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action. (gk)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS CHRIS & CAROL APPAREL, INC. by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Party 32 . FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Chris & Carol Apparel, Inc. is hereby dismissed without prejudic e from this action. 2. This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal; and 3. Plaintiff and Chris & Carol Apparel, Inc. will each bear their respective costs and attorneys fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
