In re: William Robert Norrrie
| Brad D. Krasnoff |
| William Robert Norrie and 665 33rd Street LLC |
| William Robert Norrie |
| 2:2014cv06211 |
| August 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: (1) The Motion is granted in its entirety. (2) Judgment in favor of the Trustee and against the Company on the Trustee's First Claim for Relie f. (3) The transfer of the real property commonly known as 1325 Cabrillo Ave, Venice, California, assessor's parcel number 4238-004-008 from the Debtor in favor of 665 W. 33rd Street, LLC as reflected in a grant deed recorded on or about Januar y 9, 2008 with the Los Angeles CountyRecorder as instrument no. 20080045643, is avoided. The legal description of the Property is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". (4) The Property is recovered by the Trustee. (5) Entry of a final judgment o n the Adversary Proceeding against the Company is appropriate pursuant to FRCP 54(b) because it is an ultimate disposition of the Trustee's claims against the Company in the Adversary Proceeding, it will resolve all issues with respect to title to the Property, and there is no just reason for delay. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
