Speculative Product Design, LLC v. Mattson et al
| Speculative Product Design, LLC |
| STU Distribution Services, LLC, Patrick Mattson, MD5 Technologies and Does |
| 2:2014cv06465 |
| August 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS PATRICK MATTSON, STU DISTRIBUTIONSERVICES, LLC AND MD5 TECHNOLOGIES and their agents etc re use of plaintiffs trademarks and copyrights and intellectual properties including but not limited to plaintiffs SPE CK and CANDYSHELL trademarks, copyrights, and/or patents etc. Each party shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs incurred in this matter. The Court hereby dismisses the action in its entirety upon entry of this Permanent Injunction against Defendants 33 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:In light of the Notice of Settlement (ECF No. 31), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than January 9, 2015, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
