Felipe Antonio v. Jack Friedman et al
| Felipe Antonio |
| Does 1-10, Jack Friedman and Norberto Rojas |
| 2:2014cv06762 |
| August 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Percy Anderson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #22 . This action is hereby ordered dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. (pj)
|
| Filing 22 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to with prejudice filed by Plaintiff Felipe Antonio. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Grace, Phyl) |
|
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: The parties have not filed the Joint Scheduling Report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), Local Rule 26, and the Courts Order Scheduling Meeting of Counsel and SettingScheduling Conference dated February 18, 2015. The Order Setting Scheduling Conference warns: "The failure to submit a joint report in advance of the Scheduling Conference or the failure to attend the Scheduling Conference may result in the dismissal of the action, striking the answer and entering default, and/or the imposition of sanctions." As a result of the parties' violation of the Order Setting Scheduling Conference, this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Scheduling Conference set for March 30, 2015, is vacated. See document for details. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (smo)
|
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendants Jack Friedman, Norberto Rojas, identifying Felipe Antonio, Jack Friedman and Norberto Rojas. (Matthias, Michael) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge Percy Anderson, re: Answer to Complaint #15 . The document is accepted as filed. Defendants must file their notice of interested parties by no later than 3/2/2015. (smo) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #15 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (kss) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge Percy Anderson, RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #12 . The document is accepted as filed; Other: The stipulation has already been denied. See Order issued on 2/17/2015. (smo) |
| Filing 17 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. Scheduling Conference set for 3/30/2015 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson. See document for details. (smo) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendants Jack Friedman, Norberto Rojas.(Matthias, Michael) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #12 . DENIED by Order of the Court. (smo)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #12 . The following error(s) was found: Incorrect event selected.Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below The correct event is: Stipulations - Extending Time to Answer (More than 30 days).: Stipulations - Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) event was utilized in docketing this filing. This filing, together with the prior stipulation, seeks a cumulative extension of time greater than 30 days. See Local Rule 8-3.. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (kss) |
| Filing 12 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Norberto Rojas answer now due 3/11/2015; Jack Friedman answer now due 3/11/2015, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendants Norberto Rojas; Jack Friedman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Matthias, Michael) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Norberto Rojas answer now due 2/11/2015; Jack Friedman answer now due 2/11/2015, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendants Norberto Rojas; Jack Friedman.(Attorney Michael R Matthias added to party Jack Friedman(pty:dft), Attorney Michael R Matthias added to party Norberto Rojas(pty:dft))(Matthias, Michael) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Felipe Antonio, upon Defendant Norberto Rojas served on 12/22/2014, answer due 1/12/2015. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nancy Rojas (Daughter) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons returned. (Potter, Mark) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Felipe Antonio, upon Defendant Jack Friedman served on 12/22/2014, answer due 1/12/2015. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Potter, Mark) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (jloz)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Jack Friedman, Norberto Rojas. (jp) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (jp) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Felipe Antonio. (Potter, Mark) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Felipe Antonio, identifying Felipe Antonio. (Potter, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Felipe Antonio. (Potter, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-14369314 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Felipe Antonio. (Attorney Mark D Potter added to party Felipe Antonio(pty:pla))(Potter, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
