Forged Threadworks, Inc. v. Infidel Industries LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Forged Threadworks, Inc. v. Infidel Industries LLC

Forged Threadworks, Inc. v. Infidel Industries LLC

Plaintiff:	Forged Threadworks, Inc.
Defendant:	Infidel Industries LLC
Case Number:	2:2014cv07200
Filed:	September 15, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Michael W. Fitzgerald
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit:	Copyright

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 2, 2015	Filing 24 JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Court enters Judgment in favor of FORGED THREADWORKS, INC. and against Defendant INFIDEL INDUSTRIES LLC as follows: Statutory Damag es $150,000.00; Actual Damages $ 16,777.20 plus pre-judgment interest; Attorneys' Fees $ 6,935.54 Total $173,712.74. Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them, be permanently enjoined. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
November 6, 2014	Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. In light of the Default By Clerk entered on November 4, 2014, the Court sets a hearing for Order To Show Cause Re Default Judgment for December 8, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. If a Motion for Default Judgment is filed prior to this hearing, the hearing on the Order To Show Cause will be discharged, and no appearance will be necessary. (kss)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 2, 2015

Filing 24 JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Court enters Judgment in favor of FORGED THREADWORKS, INC. and against Defendant INFIDEL INDUSTRIES LLC as follows: Statutory Damag es $150,000.00; Actual Damages $ 16,777.20 plus pre-judgment interest; Attorneys' Fees $ 6,935.54 Total $173,712.74. Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them, be permanently enjoined. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

November 6, 2014

Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. In light of the Default By Clerk entered on November 4, 2014, the Court sets a hearing for Order To Show Cause Re Default Judgment for December 8, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. If a Motion for Default Judgment is filed prior to this hearing, the hearing on the Order To Show Cause will be discharged, and no appearance will be necessary. (kss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Forged Threadworks, Inc. v. Infidel Industries LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Forged Threadworks, Inc.
Represented By:	Ben T Lila
Represented By:	Mandour and Associates APC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Infidel Industries LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?