Amethyst Kelly v. Primco, Inc. et al
Amethyst Kelly |
Does, ESMG Inc., Primco, Inc., Top Sail Productions, LLC and Maurice Williams |
2:2014cv07263 |
September 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stephen J. Hillman |
Beverly Reid O'Connell |
Trademark |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE NOTICE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. On April 2, 2015, the court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff has filed a response to the order to show cause. The court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. (rfi) |
Filing 80 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/22/2015. (rfi) |
Filing 79 JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and the Consent Decree entered herein on February 5, 2015 (the Consent Decree), that the First Amended Complaint of plaintiff Amethyst Kelly is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, against the following defendants only: Primco Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation, ESMG Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Top Sail Productions, LLC, a California limited liability company. The Consent Decree shall remain in full force and effect. Each party shall bear her or its own attorney fees and costs incurred herein. (jp) |
Filing 72 ORDER APPROVING CONSENT DECREE 71 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. The Court has vacated the Clerk's Notice of Default (Doc. 15 ) and denied as moot Plaintiff's Motion for Formal Decree Pro Confesso (Doc. 20 ). The parties agree to file such other and further documents as may be reasonably required to effectuate the intent of this Consent decree, including an agreed judgment dismissing the Primco Defendants with prejudice with each party to bear her or its own attorney fees and costs incurred herein. (See attachment Order for further details). (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.