Bahram Gholizadeh et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
| Bahram Gholizadeh and Farideh Gholizadeh |
| Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2014cv07575 |
| September 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANT WELLS FARGOS MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: 1. The complaint is hereby dismissed as to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, without leave to amend; 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank and against Plaintiffs Bahram Gholizadeh and Farideh Gholizadeh on the Complaint and all causes of action alleged therein; and3. Plaintiffs shall take and recover nothing in this action from defendantWells Fargo. (lc)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT WELLS FARGOS MOTION TO DISMISS 16 . This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (lc) Modified on 12/18/2015 (lc).
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 9 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the Court GRANTS Defendants Motion to Dismiss Without Leave to Amend as to allegations based on California Civil Codes 2923.6 and 2923.5 and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. (ECF No. 9.) The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion to Dismiss With Leave to Amend as to allegations based on UCL and promissory estoppel. (lc). Modified on 12/4/2014 .(lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
