Sunworld Industrial Company Limited v. Dye Precision Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Sunworld Industrial Company Limited v. Dye Precision Inc

Sunworld Industrial Company Limited v. Dye Precision Inc

Plaintiff:	Sunworld Industrial Company Limited
Defendant:	Dye Precision Inc
Case Number:	2:2014cv07654
Filed:	October 2, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Ronald S.W. Lew
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit:	Patent

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 15, 2015	Filing 19 ORDER Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and Request for Accounting 16 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and Requestfor Accounting is hereby GRANTED. The Court directs Defendant to provide an acco unting of the number of sales, revenues and profits earned from the sale of the Dye DAM Paintball gun or variations thereof. Defendants shall produce all documents sufficient to identify the total units of Infringing Products sold by Defendants as we ll as the total sales and profits earned from the sale of the infringing products no later than July 31, 2015. Once Defendants have provided an accounting of its profits and supporting documentation, Plaintiff shall have until August 31, 2015 to subm it a brief to the Court regarding its request for monetary damages with respect to the claims in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Dye, its officers, agents, servants and employees are permanently restrained and enjoined from infringi ng upon the asserted patents, including but not limited to making, using, offering to sell, or selling any patented invention, within the United States or importing into the United States any patented invention any products that infringe upon the asserted patents, including Dye Dam paintball gun and variations thereof as set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint, during the term of the asserted patents. Judgment shall issue after the August 31, 2015 deadline set forth above. (jre)
February 18, 2015	Filing 13 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Cou rt, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than March 9, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept o ne of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF A MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless order ed by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a response or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Failure to timely respond to this order may result in sanctions and/or the dismissal of this action. (jre)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 15, 2015

Filing 19 ORDER Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and Request for Accounting 16 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and Requestfor Accounting is hereby GRANTED. The Court directs Defendant to provide an acco unting of the number of sales, revenues and profits earned from the sale of the Dye DAM Paintball gun or variations thereof. Defendants shall produce all documents sufficient to identify the total units of Infringing Products sold by Defendants as we ll as the total sales and profits earned from the sale of the infringing products no later than July 31, 2015. Once Defendants have provided an accounting of its profits and supporting documentation, Plaintiff shall have until August 31, 2015 to subm it a brief to the Court regarding its request for monetary damages with respect to the claims in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Dye, its officers, agents, servants and employees are permanently restrained and enjoined from infringi ng upon the asserted patents, including but not limited to making, using, offering to sell, or selling any patented invention, within the United States or importing into the United States any patented invention any products that infringe upon the asserted patents, including Dye Dam paintball gun and variations thereof as set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint, during the term of the asserted patents. Judgment shall issue after the August 31, 2015 deadline set forth above. (jre)

February 18, 2015

Filing 13 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Cou rt, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than March 9, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept o ne of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF A MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless order ed by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a response or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Failure to timely respond to this order may result in sanctions and/or the dismissal of this action. (jre)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sunworld Industrial Company Limited v. Dye Precision Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dye Precision Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sunworld Industrial Company Limited
Represented By:	Joseph P Hamilton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?