Rosena Smith et al v. Vanowen Canoga Apartments, LLC et al
| Rosena Smith, Nicole Truehill and William Truehill |
| Preston Gamble, Beverly Lange, Mark Kaufman Properties Management Services, LLC and Vanowen Canoga Apartments, LLC |
| 2:2014cv07828 |
| October 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R. Gary Klausner |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND RETAINING JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner, 57 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)
|
|
Filing
51
[IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The Court has reviewed the Joint Ex Parte Application to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution as to plaintiff Nicole Truehill, filed on October 13, 2015. Plaintiff Nicole Truehill is hereby OR DERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, on or before October 23, 2015, why her action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for subm ission without oral argument. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Counsel for plaintiffs Rosena Smith and William Truehill shall promptly serve this order on plaintiff Nicole Truehill, and file a proof of service. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
