Alexander Leibman v. Alexander Sasha Prupes et al
| Alexander Leibman |
| Does and Alexander Sasha Prupes |
| 2:2014cv09003 |
| November 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| P.I.: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Leibman's motion to dismiss is DENIED. Leibman is directed to file an answer to the counterclaim by July 3, 2015. 29 (pg)
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 16 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. In accordance with the foregoing, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. This dismissal is without leave to amend as to plaintiff's Fair Debt Coll ection Practices Act claim and plaintiff's civil extortion claim to the extent plaintiff attempts to base that claim on federal criminal statutes. As to plaintiff's state law civil extortion claim, the Court declines to exercise supplemen tal jurisdiction at this time, and dismisses that claim without prejudice, and with leave to amend to adequately allege an amount in controversy supporting diversity jurisdiction. Any Second Amended Complaint must be filed by March 30, 2015, and may not add any claims for relief or defendants not already pleaded. (lom)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
