Advanced Cleanup Technologies, Inc. v. BP America, Inc. et al
| Advanced Cleanup Technologies, Inc. |
| BP America, Inc. and Does |
| 2:2014cv09033 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Contract: Marine |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Christina A. Snyder: RE MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION RE GLOBAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 18 ( filed November 17, 2017). The Court DENIES Batrizs motion to set aside the Courts August 15, 2017 order approving the global settlement agreement. (lc)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER FINDING PLAINTIFF IN CONTEMPT OF COURT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court finds Plaintiff Advanced Cleanup Technologies, Inc. ("ACTI") in civil contempt of the 8/15/2017 Order. ACTI is ordered to pay a daily fine of $250.00 for each day it remains out of compliance with the August 15 Order 84 , beginning with the day following the date of this Order. ACTI's counsel, Andrew Callari, shall personally serve a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the 8/15/2017 Order, upon Ruben Garcia. (gk)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT OF COURT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the principal of Plaintiff ADVANCED CLEANUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., namely RUBEN GARCIA, who is the Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Chief Financial Offi cer and Director of the Plaintiff corporation, shall appear on 1/22/2018 10:00 AM before Judge Christina A. Snyder, to show cause why ADVANCED CLEANUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. should not be found to be in Contempt of Court and compelled by all lawful means to obey the Court Order filed in this action on 8/15/2017. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with a copy of the Order filed 8/15/2017, shall be served upon RUBEN GARCIA by any means of service permitted b y Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e) unless such service cannot be made despite reasonable efforts. In all events service to the Plaintiff corporation by serving its counsel in this action, namely Andrew Callari, Esq., shall be deemed sufficient service to the Plaintiff corporation. (gk)
|
|
Filing
79
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) CLAIMANT CUDA ENTERPRISES, INC. MOTION FOR A DETERMINATION THAT CARMEN M. BATRIZ d/b/a CMB PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HAS NO LIEN AGAINST THE RECOVERY IN THIS ACTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Cuda and Batriz's liens arise fr om state court actions that are factually unrelated to the underlying action between ACT and BP. Therefore, they are not part of the same case or controversy as the underlying action, and this Court does not have supplemental jurisdiction over Cuda and Batriz's state law claims. Cuda Enterprises, Inc.'s motion seeking a determination that claimant Batriz has no lien against the recovery in this action 66 is, therefore, DENIED. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
56
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 52 . The Court GRANTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, account stated, and open book account. The Court DENIES defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims for quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
