Diane Acero v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Diane Acero v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Diane Acero
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2014cv09597
Filed:	December 15, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Margaret M. Morrow
Presiding Judge:	Jean P. Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 4, 2016	Filing 23 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 22 . IT IS ORDERED th at EAJA fees are awarded in the amount of four thousand, seven hundred eleven dollars and eight cents ($4,711.08), and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920 in the amount of four hundred dollars and no cents ($400.00), subject to the provisions of the EAJA and subject to the terms of the stipulation between the parties. (bem)
March 14, 2016	Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 20 . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, it is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED that (1) Plaintiff's request for an order reversing the Commissioner's decision is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 4, 2016

Filing 23 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 22 . IT IS ORDERED th at EAJA fees are awarded in the amount of four thousand, seven hundred eleven dollars and eight cents ($4,711.08), and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920 in the amount of four hundred dollars and no cents ($400.00), subject to the provisions of the EAJA and subject to the terms of the stipulation between the parties. (bem)

March 14, 2016

Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 20 . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, it is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED that (1) Plaintiff's request for an order reversing the Commissioner's decision is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diane Acero v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane Acero
Represented By:	James P Shea
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?