Michael Corona et al v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.
| Michael Corona and Christina Mathis |
| Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv09600 |
| December 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephen J. Hillman |
| R. Gary Klausner |
| Contract: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice of Electronic Filing re Notice of Filing Fee Due (PHV) 7 , Notice of Filing Fee Due (PHV) 8 , Notice of Filing Fee Due (PHV) 9 , Notice of Filing Fee Due (PHV) 10 e-mailed to Attorney Cari Campen Laufenberg at claufenberg@kellerohrback.com bounced due to typo in email address. Primary e-mail address corrected. Notice of Electronic Filing resent addressed to claufenberg@kellerrohrback.com. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ir) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 Notice of Electronic Filing re Notice of Filing Fee Due (PHV) 7 , Notice of Filing Fee Due (PHV) 8 , Notice of Filing Fee Due (PHV) 9 , Notice of Filing Fee Due (PHV) 10 e-mailed to Attorney Amy N L Hanson at ahanson@kellerohrback.com bounced due to typo in email address. Primary e-mail address corrected. Notice of Electronic Filing resent addressed to ahanson@kellerohrback.com. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ir) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Amy N L Hanson for Plaintiffs Michael Corona, Christina Mathis. re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 . Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Cari Campen Laufenberg for Plaintiffs Michael Corona, Christina Mathis. re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 . Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Gretchen Freeman Cappio for Plaintiffs Michael Corona, Christina Mathis. re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 . Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Lynn Lincoln Sarko for Plaintiffs Michael Corona, Christina Mathis. re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 . Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (et) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 as to Defendant Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Michael Corona, Christina Mathis, (Karmand, Khesraw) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 Michael Corona, Christina Mathis. (Karmand, Khesraw) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Michael Corona, Christina Mathis. (Karmand, Khesraw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-14926769 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Khesraw Karmand added to party Michael Corona(pty:pla), Attorney Khesraw Karmand added to party Christina Mathis(pty:pla))(Karmand, Khesraw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
