National Immigration Law Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
| National Immigration Law Center |
| United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| United States of Department of Homeland Security |
| 2:2014cv09632 |
| December 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Freedom of Information Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement against National Immigration Law Center: On December 11, 2015, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Moti on for Summary Judgment and denying Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 64. The Court ordered Plaintiff to submit additional documentation to Plaintiff by February 9, 2016. Id. Furthermore, the Court stated that any new motion fo r summary judgment must be filed by February 23, 2016. Id. Defendant complied with the Court's order to submit additional documentation to Plaintiff by February 9, 2016. Dkt. 66. On February 26, 2016, Plaintiff notified the Court that no additional motions for summary judgment will be filed by either party. Id. Accordingly, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED for Defendant. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
