Placido Valdez v. Terminix International Company Limited Partnership
Plaintiff: Placido Valdez
Defendant: Does and Terminix International Company Limited Partnership
Case Number: 2:2014cv09748
Filed: December 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: re 20 MOTION to Dismiss. The Court hereby orders the parties to engage in arbitration under the terms of the arbitration agreement, with the exception of the PAGA claim, which remains before the Court and is not stayed. The affirmative defense clause, however, is unconscionable and unenforceable and severed from the agreement. (shb)
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 8 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Court therefore orders Plaintiff to file the correct operative complaint with this Court, either by stipulation or, if the parties are unable to agree, by motion. Any such sti pulation or motion for leave to file a first amended complaint shall be filed no later than ten days after the date of this order. Failure to file either a stipulation or a motion for leave to file a firstamended complaint within ten days may be deem ed a waiver of Plaintiffs PAGA claim or claims. Because ruling on the issues of law surrounding the PAGA claim appears to be critical to the resolution of this motion to dismiss, the Court finds that it cannot proceed with the motion until the approp riate operative complaint is filed in this federal action. The Motion to Dismiss is VACATED, but Defendant is free to bring the same or a similar motion if Plaintiff either files a first amended complaint or allows the ten day deadline to pass without filing a stipulation or motion. Nothing in this order acts as a decision on the merits of any claim or defense in this case. (lc) Modified on 2/19/2015 (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Placido Valdez v. Terminix International Company Limited Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terminix International Company Limited Partnership
Represented By: Michelle Rapoport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Placido Valdez
Represented By: Kane Moon
Represented By: Garen Nadir
Represented By: David Yeremian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?