In re: Kathleen Kellogg-Taxe
Carolyn A. Dye |
Gregory Grantham, Kathleen Kellogg-Taxe, John Saba and Ronald Taxe |
Kathleen Kellogg-Taxe |
2:2015cv00084 |
January 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER DENYING APPEAL AND AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY COURT' SANCTIONS 2 , 24 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For all the reasons discussed above, this Court DENIES Debtor Kathleen Kellogg-Taxe's appeal and AFFIRMS the award of sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) Modified on 12/8/2015 (lom). |
Filing 45 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE APPELLANT RONALD TAXES OPENING BRIEF AND DISMISS APPEAL 32 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Taxes brief is stricken from the docket and his appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice. 22 , 23 . Trustee Carolyn A. Dyes Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED 32 . (lc). Modified on 10/19/2015 (lc). |
Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEFS 11 , 14 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Appellants deadline to file is hereby extended to July 30, 2015. Because this is the second extension of time, there will be no further continuances absent unusual circumstances. (lc). Modified on 7/8/2015 (lc). |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPELLANTS TO FILE OPENING BRIEFS 7 , 9 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Appellants opening briefs will be due June 30, 2015. (lc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.