Samantha Jones v. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Company
| Samantha Jones |
| Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc and Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. |
| 2:2015cv00105 |
| January 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, in favor of Robert Grob, Samantha Jones against Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. AWARDS Class Counsel attorneys fees in the amount of $2,400,000; AWARDS Class Counsel costs in the amount of $43,323.69; AWARDS $10,000.00 to Plaintiffs Jones and Grob; ORDERS the payment of $37,500.00 to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency; ORDERS the payment of $154,500 to the claims administrator; and DISM ISSES the Complaint WITH PREJUDICE. Related to: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Settlement Approval of Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs, and Class Representative Enhancements 81 . MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (twdb)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER TO CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Hon. William Alsup re 18 Motion to Transfer Case.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2015) [Transferred from California Northern on 1/7/2015.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
