Phil Jennerjahn v. City of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: Phil Jennerjahn
Defendant: City of Los Angeles, Office of the City Clerk and The Department of Neighborhood Empowerment/Empower LA
Case Number: 2:2015cv00263
Filed: January 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stephen J. Hillman
Presiding Judge: John F. Walter
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. Pursuant to the Court's Order Dismissing Action Without Prejudice. IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned case is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dml)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish re Order to Show Cause Re Possible Dismissal. If he wishes to pursue this action, within ten (10) days of this Order, Plaintiff shall either file and serve a response to this Order ex plaining his failure to comply with the District Judge's April 5 Order, or file and serve a Second Amended Complaint that complies with the April 5 Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to comply with this Order will be deemed to constitute his consent to the dismissal of this case, without prejudice. (ec)
April 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 34 . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. (See order for details) (ec)
September 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 26 . IT IS ORDERED that: the Motion to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles [Dkt. No. 8] is GRANTED; the Complaint is dismissed, with leave to amend, pursuant to Rules 8 and 12(b)(6)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and Plaintiff shall file and serve his First Amended Complaint within sixty (60) days of this Order. (ec)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phil Jennerjahn v. City of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Represented By: Gerald M Sato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of the City Clerk
Represented By: Gerald M Sato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Department of Neighborhood Empowerment/Empower LA
Represented By: Gerald M Sato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phil Jennerjahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?