Dee A Reed v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Dee A Reed v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Dee A Reed
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2015cv00526
Filed:	January 23, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jesus G. Bernal
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 14, 2015	Filing 26 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses 25 : IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,600.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (kl)
October 29, 2015	Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Order to Remand Case to State Court, 23 . The Court, having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand") lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 14, 2015

Filing 26 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses 25 : IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,600.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (kl)

October 29, 2015

Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Order to Remand Case to State Court, 23 . The Court, having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand") lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dee A Reed v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dee A Reed
Represented By:	Young Chul Cho
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?