National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, Inc. v. Hollywood Entertainment Group LLC et al
National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, Inc. |
Craig Banaszewski and Hollywood Entertainment Group LLC |
2:2015cv00594 |
January 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Margaret M. Morrow |
Margaret A. Nagle |
Trademark |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 50 filed by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court hereby dismisses the action, with prejudice, upon entry of this Permanent Injunct ion, with each party to bear its/his own costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for all purposes of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Order. (See attached document for details.) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lom) |
Filing 39 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon re Stipulation for Protective Order 38 . (Language added by the Court in paragraphs 15 and 17 of this Order). (ib) |
Filing 34 AMENDED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SETTING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BANASZEWSKI'S DEPOSITION by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. (ah) |
Filing 30 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST CRAIGBANASZEWSKI 26 by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. See order for details. (ah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.