Harout Bagdasaryan et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Harout Bagdasaryan and Masis Bagdasaryan |
| City of Los Angeles and Does |
| 2:2015cv01008 |
| February 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| Josephine L. Staton |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
209
JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant the City of Los Angeles, and against Plaintiffs Masis Bagdasaryan and Harout Bagdasaryan, on Plaintiffs' First Cause of Action (Substantive Due Process), Second C ause of Action (Procedural Due Process), Fourth Cause of Action (Abuse of Process), Fifth Causes of Action (Elder Abuse), and Sixth Cause of Action (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, judg ment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs Masis Bagdasaryan and Harout Bagdasaryan, and against Defendant the City of Los Angeles, on Plaintiffs Third Cause of Action (California Public Records Act) as alleged in the Third Amended Complaint, in the tot al amount of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), which includes all costs of suit in this action, and reasonable attorneys' fees, if any, recoverable under California Government Code Section 6259. As Plaintiffs agreed that Defendant City of Los Angeles produced, during the above-entitled action, all documents responsive to Plaintiffs' California Public Records Act Cause of Action as alleged in the Third Amended Complaint, there is no injunctive or declaratory relief that Plai ntiffs can obtain under California Government Code Section 6258. This judgment concerning the California Public Records Act Cause of Action does not constitute an admission of liability by or on behalf of Defendant City of Los Angeles, which expressly denies any and all liability to Plaintiffs in any amount. This judgment is also not an admission that Plaintiffs have sustained any damages on theCalifornia Public Records Act Cause of Action. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge Josephine L. Staton: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; The Citys Motion to Dismiss the first, second, and fourth ca uses of action alleged by Harout Bagdasaryani.e., his due process and abuse of power claimsis granted, and those claims are dismissed with prejudice; The remainder of the City's Motion to Dismiss is denied; and The City's Answer filed on March 22, 2016 (Dkt. 38) is deemed as answer in response to the claims remaining in Plaintiffs' lawsuit following entry of this Order. See document for further information. (lwag)
|
|
Filing
11
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS)by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block finding as moot Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement 9 . Defendant is ordered to respond to the Second Amended Complaint within 21 days of the service thereof. (see document for further details) (jdo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
