Sarah Diane Slice v. City of Glendale et al
| Sarah Diane Slice |
| Chief Robert M. Castro, City of Glendale, Does and Officer Segura |
| 2:2015cv01079 |
| February 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin, Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 15 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/3/2015. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why judgment should not be entered in favor of the defense and the action dismissed under Lo cal Rule 7-12 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 for failure to prosecute the case. Alternatively, Plaintiff may request the voluntary dismissal of the action with no further consequence. Plaintiff is expressly cautioned that her failure to respond to this order will lead the Court to conclude that the motion is unopposed and may result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Rules 12 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 41-1. (rh)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 7/13/2015. (mz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
