CN Southern Properties and Investments Inc v. Evangelina Carrillo et al
| CN Southern Properties and Investments Inc |
| Evangelina Carrillo and Does |
| 2:2015cv01400 |
| February 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| S. James Otero |
| Alka Sagar |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT 19 by Judge S. James Otero. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See attached document for details.) Case remanded to Superior Court of California at Pasadena Courthouse; case no. 15P00120. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (Mailed 4/14/15) (lom)
|
|
Filing
10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge S. James Otero: NOTICE OF ORDER CONTINUINGSCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND VACATING HEARING ON MOTION: The Court continues the Scheduling Conference from April 13, 2015, to Monday, May 11, 2015 8:30 a.m. Additionally the Cou rt finds the following Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff CN Southern Properties and Investments Inc 9 suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacates the hearing, set for hearing on April 13, 2015. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). The briefing schedule remains as set by Local Rule. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
