Jazmine Jamal Jones v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Jazmine Jamal Jones v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Jazmine Jamal Jones v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Jazmine Jamal Jones
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2015cv01501
Filed:	March 2, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge:	John A. Kronstadt
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 4, 2016	Filing 32 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,314.10 a s authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Petition for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 28) is hereby dismissed as moot. (lwag)
March 17, 2016	Filing 29 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on January 7, 2016, the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is reversed and this action is remanded for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (lwag)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 4, 2016

Filing 32 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,314.10 a s authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Petition for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 28) is hereby dismissed as moot. (lwag)

March 17, 2016

Filing 29 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on January 7, 2016, the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is reversed and this action is remanded for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (lwag)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jazmine Jamal Jones v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jazmine Jamal Jones
Represented By:	Lawrence D Rohlfing
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?