Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance USA, Inc. et al v. Kyocera Mita Corporation, a Japan corporation et al
Plaintiff: Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America and Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance USA, Inc.
Defendant: Does, Kyocera Document Solutions Inc, Kyocera Document Technology Co Ltd., Kyocera Mita Corporation and Shindengen Electric Manufacturing Company Ltd
Case Number: 2:2015cv01860
Filed: March 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Prop. Damage Prod. Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 7 12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. For the reasons discussed above, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motions to Dismiss with prejudice 7 12 . The Clerk is ordered to close this case.IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lom)
April 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Stipulation for Protective Order, 45 (see attached) (jm)
October 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SHINDENGEN ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS 18 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. For the reasons discussed above, the Court GRANTS Shindengen's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 18 . Shindengen is hereby dismissed from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DEFERRING MOTIONS TO DISMISS 7 , 12 AND GRANTING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs request to conduct limited jurisdictional discovery as to Defendants KDS and KDT. Discovery shall be limited to information directly relevant to the extent of KDS and KDTs contacts with California and the nature of their relationships with Kyocera America. Plaintiffs shall file one supplemental brief as to both KDS and KDT by November 8, 2015. KDS and KDT may file a joint response by November 16, 2015. Each brief shall not exceed 10 pages. The Court will issue a ruling on KDS and KTDs Motions to Dismiss thereafter. (lc). Modified on 9/25/2015 (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance USA, Inc. et al v. Kyocera Mita Corporation, a Japan corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kyocera Document Solutions Inc
Represented By: Jeffrey A Swedo
Represented By: Nathaniel James Tarvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kyocera Document Technology Co Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kyocera Mita Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shindengen Electric Manufacturing Company Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America
Represented By: David Dewart Brisco
Represented By: Thomas M Regan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance USA, Inc.
Represented By: David Dewart Brisco
Represented By: Thomas M Regan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?