Pacific Court - Pine Square Partners v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. et al
| Pacific Court - Pine Square Partners |
| American Multi-Cinema, Inc, Does 1 through 20, inclusive, AMC Entertainment, Inc. and American Multi-Cinema, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv02233 |
| March 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 34 JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to Plaintiffs Notice of Acceptance of Rule 68 Offer of Judgment, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, American Multi- Cinema, Inc. dba AMC Pine Square 16 and AMC Entertainment, Inc., jointly and severally, in the amount of $60,775.00, which is inclusive of all costs and/or fees recoverable in this action. The scheduling conference on December 18, 2015 is vacated. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (kti) |
Filing 33
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, having received the Defendants' answer #30 , hereby DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause issued on October 27, 215 #29 . IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 32 NOTICE Notice of Acceptance of Rule 68 Offer of Judgment filed by Plaintiff Pacific Court - Pine Square Partners. (Brinton, Matthew) |
| Filing 31 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26 (f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee is set for hearing 12/18/2015 at 11:00 AM. (iv) |
| Filing 30 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #15 Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc..(Platt, Robert) |
|
Filing 29
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION.plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before November 10, 2015 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by the defendants;Plaintiff's application for entry of default.No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a responseby plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (lc)
|
| Filing 28 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dolly M. Gee: ORDER RE DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT #18 . 1. Defendants motion to dismiss Pacific Courts breach of contract claim is GRANTED with prejudice as to Americans failure to remove its fixtures and DENIED with leave to amend as to Americans failure to pay the flat-rate fee; 2. Defendants motion to dismiss Pacific Courts claim against AMC for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is GRANTED with prejudice, but DENIED as to the implied covenant claim against American ; 3. Defendants motion for a more definite statement is DENIED; 4. Pacific Court may file an amended complaint, or notify Defendants that it does not intend to amend, within 15 days from the date of this Order; and 5. Defendants shall file their response within 15 days after filing or service of an amended complaint or notification that Pacific Court does not intend to amend. (lc) |
|
Filing 27
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE #25 . (lc)
|
| Filing 26 DECLARATION of Kishan H. Barot re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #25 Declaration of Kishan H. Barot in Response to Order to Show Cause Why This Action Should Not Be Remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. (Barot, Kishan) |
|
Filing 25
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Defendants are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants shall file their response by no later than June 25, 2015. Failure to file a timely and satisfactory response will result in the remand of this action to state court. (lc)
|
|
Filing 24
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court finds that Defendants Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E) #18 presently scheduled for hearing on June 5, 2015, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 23 REPLY in Support of MOTION to Dismiss all cause of action Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E); Declaration of Kishan Barot #18 /Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E) filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. (Barot, Kishan) |
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION to Dismiss all cause of action Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E); Declaration of Kishan Barot #18 filed by Plaintiff Pacific Court - Pine Square Partners. (Brinton, Matthew) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: MOTION to Dismiss all cause of action Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E); Declaration of Kishan Barot #18 , Notice of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A),, #19 . The following error(s) was found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment.: Clerk had incorrect case number on previous deficiency notice. Do not respond to this notice as the proposed order has been submitted. (shb) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF LODGING filed /Notice of Lodging of Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a more Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E)) (Barot, Kishan) re MOTION to Dismiss all cause of action Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E); Declaration of Kishan Barot #18 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a more Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E))(Barot, Kishan) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: MOTION to Dismiss all cause of action Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E); Declaration of Kishan Barot #18 . The following error(s) was found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss all cause of action Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6), or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Under Rule 12(E); Declaration of Kishan Barot filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 6/5/2015 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Decl. of Kishan Barot)(Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On April 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint #16 . In light of the foregoing, Defendants motion to dismiss #11 , filed on April 1, 2015, is DENIED as moot. The May 8, 2015 hearing on that motion is VACATED. (lc) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Pacific Court - Pine Square Partners, identifying Pacific Court -- Pine Square Partners, Long Beach Pacific Court Apartments, LLC, Long Beach Pine Square, LLC, Pacific Court Residential Management, Inc., Alex Meruelo, trustee of the Alex Meruelo Living Trust, LBPS Management Co. Inc.. (Brinton, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Pacific Court - Pine Square Partners (Brinton, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Kishan H. Barot in Support of MOTION to Dismiss All Causes of Action Defendants American Multi-Cinema, Inc. and AMC Entertainment Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6) #11 filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. (Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Robert H. Platt in Support of MOTION to Dismiss All Causes of Action Defendants American Multi-Cinema, Inc. and AMC Entertainment Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6) #11 filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. (Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. (Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss All Causes of Action Defendants American Multi-Cinema, Inc. and AMC Entertainment Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(6) filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/8/2015 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Platt, Robert) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: PILOT PROJECT RE SEALED DOCUMENTS by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (vv)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee.(SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (vv)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (jp) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ORIGINAL FILED COMPLAINT against Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc., Does 1 through 20. Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Pacific Court - Pine Square Partners. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/25/2015 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ). (jp) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc., of Notice to Adverse Party of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court. served on 3/25/2015. (Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Ron Herman re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. (Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Robert H. Platt re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. (Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc., identifying 1. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.; 2 AMC Pine Square 16; 3. AMC Entertainment Inc.; 4. Marquee Holdings Inc.; 5. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.; and 6. Dalian Wanda Group.. (Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. (Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number NC059933 Receipt No: 0973-15437948 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants AMC Entertainment, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc.. (Attorney Robert H Platt added to party AMC Entertainment, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Robert H Platt added to party American Multi-Cinema, Inc.(pty:dft))(Platt, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
