Atul Kumar v. Alfano Motorcars, Inc. et al
| Atul Kumar |
| Alfano Motorcars, Inc., Does and Mercedes-Benz USA LLC |
| 2:2015cv02768 |
| April 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Stephen V. Wilson |
| Other Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC PURSUANT TO JOINT STIPULATION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC is dismissed from this case with prejudice. Plaintiff's case against Alfano Motorcar s Inc. remains on the inactive calendar pending the outcome of the arbitration proceedings currently underway between Plaintiff and Alfano. Case Terminated. Made JS-6., Mercedes-Benz USA LLC (a Delaware limited liability company) terminated. (shb)
|
|
Filing
12
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Co urt, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than June 1, 2015 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to Defendant Alfano Motorcars, Inc., served on April 17, 2015, whose answer was due 5/8/2015. (pc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
