Cyrus Raphael v. Tesoro Refining and marketing Company LLC et al
| Cyrus Raphael |
| Does and Tesoro Refining and marketing Company LLC |
| 2:2015cv02862 |
| April 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 29 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Tesoros Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lc). Modified on 9/25/2015 (lc).
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting 11 MOTION to Dismiss With Leave to Amend. Raphael shall file an amended complaint by July 22, 2015. (shb)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND 12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. For the reasons set forth above, the Court finds that federal question jurisdiction exists and DENIES Raphael's Motion to Remand. (lom)
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Hearing on MOTION to DismissComplaint 11 : MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court 12 .The hearing on the above-referenced MOTIONS, scheduled for June 1, 2015 at 1:30P.M., are hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary.The matters stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
