Shirley Lindsay v. Sanjay J. Patel et al
Shirley Lindsay |
Canoga Park Investment Group, Inc., Does and Sanjay J. Patel |
2:2015cv03015 |
April 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F. Eick |
Otis D. Wright |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER CONTINUING OSC RESPONSE RE SETTLEMENT DATE TO NOVEMBER 12, 2015 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc) |
Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OSC RE: SETTLEMENT 19 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS the stipulation. The Court ORDERS that the Courts OSC re: Settlement is continued October 14, 2015. On or before that date, parties must SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc). Modified on 9/18/2015 (lc). |
Filing 18 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court herebyORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by September 23, 2015, whysettlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates anddeadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court willdischarge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.