Debpraj Slatzer v. Blood Moon Productions et al
| Deborah Slatzer |
| Blood Moon Productions, Does, National Book Network and Turnaround Publisher Services |
| 2:2015cv03242 |
| April 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURTS AUGUST 13, 2015 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (see attached) Although defendants thereafter filed a document entitled Joint Stipulation, it appears that plaintiff did not part icipate in the preparation of the stipulation. Therefore, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within 5 days of the date of this order why she should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with the Court's August 13, 2015 order to cooperate in the preparation of a joint stipulation with respect to defendants' motion to compel. (jm)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, within five days of the date of this order, if any she has, why she should not be sanctioned for failing to meet and confer with defendants regarding the issues raised by defendants' motion to compel and cooperate in the preparation of a joint stipulation. (see attached) (jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
