Darnell Monday et al v. Jim McDonnell et al
| Darnell Monday, Latanya Monday and Ralph Monday |
| Charlie Beck, Sgt. Bedolla, Bedolla, Blackman, Chamberlain, City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles Police Department, County of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, Does, Fields, Jim McDonnell and Officer Wolman |
| 2:2015cv03514 |
| May 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| John E. McDermott |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re Stipulation for Protective Order 66 . (san)
|
|
Filing
34
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Percy Anderson: Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, and Sheriff Jim McDonnell 23 and a Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant City of Los Angeles 25 , in which defendants Charlie Beck, Carlos Bedolla, Jeffrey Wolman, William Chamberlain, Scott Blackman, and Jimmie Fields have joined 30 . Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds these matters are appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for July 6, 2015, is vacated, and the matters taken off calendar. The Court grants the Motions to Dismiss in part [23 and 25] and stays this action pending resolution of Darnell's criminal charges. The parties shall file with the Court a Status Report no later than 14 days after the criminal charges are resolved in the Superior Court. Once theCourt receives the Status Report, the Court will either proceed to rule on the remaining arguments contained in the Motions to Dismiss, set a status conference, or make further orders as appropriate based on the contents of the Status Report. The Court orders this action administratively closed and removedfrom the Court's active caseload until further application by the parties or order of this Court. See document for details. (smo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
