United States of America v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: City of Los Angeles and Does
Case Number: 2:2015cv03919
Filed: May 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge: Jean P. Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 62 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
June 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 (IN CHAMBERS) - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee.The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before June 15, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to defen dants Kenneth Dinsmoor, Earl Foust, Jesus Del Villar, Jeff Follin, Quoc Tran Tran, and Jeffrey Miller for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filin g of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendants Kenneth Dinsmoor, Earl Foust, Jesus Del Villar, Jeff Follin, Quoc Tran Tran, and Jeffrey Miller if the above- mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
April 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before April 26, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendants Kenneth Dinsmoor, Earl Foust, Jesus Del Villar, Jeff Follin, Quoc Tran Tran, and Jeffrey Miller for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted up on the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendants Kenneth Dinsmoor, Earl Foust, Jesus Del Villar, Jeff Follin, Quoc Tran Tran, and Jeffrey Miller if the above- mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Kevin Bruce Finn
Represented By: Keith M Staub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?