Benjamin Adam Ma v. W. L. Montgomery

Benjamin Adam Ma v. W. L. Montgomery

Petitioner:	Benjamin Adam Ma
Respondent:	W. L. Montgomery
Case Number:	2:2016cv07970
Filed:	October 26, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Cormac J. Carney
Presiding Judge:	Karen E. Scott
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 17, 2017	Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Pursuant to the Courts Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge,IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mba)
November 2, 2016	Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HABEAS PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Accordingly, the Petition is untimely on its face and, on the current record, Petitioner has failed to show that he is entitled to statut ory tolling, equitable tolling, or the benefit of the actual innocence exception to AEDPAs statute of limitations. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before December 2, 2016, Petitioner shall show cause on writing, if any he has, why the Court should not recommend that this action be dismissed with prejudice on the ground of untimeliness. (see document for details). (dro)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 17, 2017

Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Pursuant to the Courts Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge,IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mba)

November 2, 2016

Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HABEAS PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Accordingly, the Petition is untimely on its face and, on the current record, Petitioner has failed to show that he is entitled to statut ory tolling, equitable tolling, or the benefit of the actual innocence exception to AEDPAs statute of limitations. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before December 2, 2016, Petitioner shall show cause on writing, if any he has, why the Court should not recommend that this action be dismissed with prejudice on the ground of untimeliness. (see document for details). (dro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benjamin Adam Ma v. W. L. Montgomery
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Benjamin Adam Ma
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?