Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC
| Sound View Innovations, LLC |
| Hulu, LLC |
| 2:2017cv04146 |
| June 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1094
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. On August 15, 2017, Sound View Innovations, LLC filed a First Amended Complaint alleging that Hulu, LLC (Hulu) infringed Claim 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,708,213 On February 13, 2023, Hulu filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of Claim 16 of the '213 Patent. On September 8, 2023, Hulus Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of Claim 16 of the 213 Patent was granted. Accordingly, Final Judgment is her eby entered as follows: Hulu does not infringe Claim 16 of the '213 Patent. Hulu's Sixth Counterclaim is hereby dismissed as moot without prejudice to Hulu requesting to revive its counterclaim and defenses after appeal. Because no claims remain in this action, the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Hulu. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)
|
|
Filing
924
FINAL JUDGMENT 923 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court hereby enters its Final Judgment as follows: 1. Claim 14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,806,062 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for lack of patentable subject matter. 2. Hulu does not infrin ge Claim 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,708,213. 3. Count One of Sound View's First Amended Complaint and Hulu's First and Sixth Counterclaims are hereby dismissed as moot without prejudice to each party requesting to revive its claim or counterclaim(s) and defenses after appeal. 4. Because no claims remain in this action, the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Hulu. (lom)
|
|
Filing
58
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Amended Protective order by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams re Stipulation for Protective order 56 57 . (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
