Marc Harris et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Does 1-100, inclusive and Marc Harris
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 2:2017cv04964
Filed: July 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: S James Otero
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2017 Filing 14 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court, No. BC 663873. (lc)
August 9, 2017 Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge S. James Otero :ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND REMANDING ACTION TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES #9 , #10 Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this action to Los Angeles County Superior Court. This action shall close. Case Remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, BC 663873. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lc)
August 8, 2017 Filing 12 The Court finds the following motions suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacates the hearing re the MOTION for Leave to file Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Plainitff Marc Harris. [ECF#9] and the MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court - Dept. 61 filed by Plaintiff Marc Harris [ECF #10], set for hearing on August 21, 2017. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). No appearance is required. The briefing schedule remains as set by Local Rule. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 21, 2017 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Marc Harris, re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file Leave to File First Amended Complaint #9 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court - Dept. 61 #10 served on July 21, 2017. (Davoodi, Natan)
July 21, 2017 Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court - Dept. 61 filed by Plaintiff Marc Harris. Motion set for hearing on 8/21/2017 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Business Search Entity) (Davoodi, Natan)
July 21, 2017 Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Plainitff Marc Harris. Motion set for hearing on 8/21/2017 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - FAC, #2 Exhibit B - Redlined FAC, #3 Proposed Order) (Davoodi, Natan)
July 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge S. James Otero. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/5/2017. Scheduling Conference set for 9/18/2017 at 08:30 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
July 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
July 6, 2017 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
July 6, 2017 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et)
July 6, 2017 Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Richardson, Katie)
July 6, 2017 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Ford's Certificate of Interested Parties [Local Rule 7.1-1] filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company identifying Ford Motor Company as Corporate Parent. (Richardson, Katie)
July 6, 2017 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Richardson, Katie)
July 6, 2017 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC663873 Receipt No: 0973-20135482 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Ford's Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Katie A Richardson added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Richardson, Katie)
July 6, 2017 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Ford Motor Company, Does 1-100, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Marc Harris. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/6/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT #1] (et)
July 5, 2017 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/5/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT #2](et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marc Harris et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Does 1-100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marc Harris
Represented By: Natan Davoodi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Katie A Richardson
Represented By: Daniel S Rodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?