Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington |
Commissioner Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill |
2:2019cv04185 |
May 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV19-4185 JPR on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Jennifer A Kenney added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Kenney, Jennifer) |
Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Shapiro, Brian) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 5/30/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Shapiro, Brian) |
Filing 11 NOTICE Potential Conflict of Interest filed by Plaintiff Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington. (Shapiro, Brian) |
Filing 10 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Order re Possible Conflicts of Interest by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. No later than seven days from the date of this order, Plaintiff's counsel must file notice that ALJ Rosenbluth did or did not participate in or preside over Plaintiff's case. (See document for details.) (et) |
Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. In order to facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this case, the parties must comply with the following instructions. Please read this order carefully, as it may differ from other judges' orders for Social Security appeals. (See document for details.) (et) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (sbou) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (sbou) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington, (Shapiro, Brian) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington. (Shapiro, Brian) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington. (Shapiro, Brian) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington. (Shapiro, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington. (Attorney Brian C Shapiro added to party Alisa M.E. Gomez Washington(pty:pla))(Shapiro, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.