Cinq Music Group, LLC v. Create Music Group, Inc. et al
| Cinq Music Group, LLC |
| Create Music Group, Inc. and Does 1-20, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv07505 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING Parties' Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer #10 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that Defendant's Create Music Group, Inc., responsive pleading to Plaintiff's initial complaint shall be due on 12/21/2022. (jp)
|
|
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (vv)
|
|
Filing 10
Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to December 21, 2022 filed by Defendant Create Music Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gipson, Elliot)
|
|
Filing 9
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car)
|
|
Filing 6
First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendant Create Music Group, Inc..(Gipson, Elliot)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Create Music Group, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Report on Filing of Copyright Action (Initial Notification) #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 10/14/2022. (Gipson, Elliot)
|
|
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Cinq Music Group, LLC, upon Defendant Create Music Group, Inc. served on 9/15/2022, answer due 10/6/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe Receptionist accepting service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. Submitted with Attachment 3 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Create Music Group, Inc., Does 1-20, inclusive, filed by Plaintiff Cinq Music Group, LLC. Filed in State Court on 10/14/2022 Submitted with Attachment 3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
|
|
Filing 4
REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Create Music Group, Inc.. (Gipson, Elliot)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Create Music Group, Inc., (Gipson, Elliot)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Create Music Group, Inc.. (Gipson, Elliot)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 22STCV29711 Receipt No: ACACDC-34154603 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Create Music Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit License Agreement (Swell & Shiloh), #2 Exhibit License Agreement (Create & Shiloh), #3 Exhibit State Court Documents (summons, complaint, proof of service, notice of case management conference), #4 Exhibit Notice to Adverse Parties (to be filed)) (Attorney Elliot Brandt Gipson added to party Create Music Group, Inc. (pty:bkmov))(Gipson, Elliot)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
