Rhonda L Cisneros v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Rhonda L Cisneros v. Michael J Astrue

Rhonda L Cisneros v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Rhonda L Cisneros
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	5:2007cv01045
Filed:	August 17, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Eastern Division - Riverside Office
County:	Riverside
Presiding Judge:	David O. Carter
Presiding Judge:	Rosalyn M. Chapman
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 24, 2009	Filing 22 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman. Fees awarded to William M. Kuntz in the amount of $ 2307.00. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 21 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs counsel, as Plaintiffs assignee, shall be aw arded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA) in the amount of TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SEVEN DOLLARS and no/cents ($2,307.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. (jy)
November 26, 2008	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) plaintiffs request for relief is granted; and (2) the Commissioners decision is reversed, and the action is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion and Order, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and Judgment shall be entered accordingly. See order for further details. (jy)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 24, 2009

Filing 22 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman. Fees awarded to William M. Kuntz in the amount of $ 2307.00. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 21 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs counsel, as Plaintiffs assignee, shall be aw arded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA) in the amount of TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SEVEN DOLLARS and no/cents ($2,307.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. (jy)

November 26, 2008

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) plaintiffs request for relief is granted; and (2) the Commissioners decision is reversed, and the action is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion and Order, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and Judgment shall be entered accordingly. See order for further details. (jy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhonda L Cisneros v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rhonda L Cisneros
Represented By:	William M Kuntz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?