Jose A Espinoza v. Michael J Astrue

Jose A Espinoza v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Jose A Espinoza
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	5:2010cv01460
Filed:	September 24, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Margaret A. Nagle
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 28, 2011	Filing 21 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle, Re: Stipulation for Attorney Fees, 20 . IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS and 00/100s ($4,450.00) plus costs in the amount of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY dollars ($350.00) as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §2412(d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. (mz)
October 17, 2011	Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 16 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the provisions of the Memorandum Opinion and Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mz)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 28, 2011

Filing 21 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle, Re: Stipulation for Attorney Fees, 20 . IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS and 00/100s ($4,450.00) plus costs in the amount of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY dollars ($350.00) as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §2412(d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. (mz)

October 17, 2011

Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 16 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the provisions of the Memorandum Opinion and Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose A Espinoza v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Heather M Melton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose A Espinoza
Represented By:	Shanny J Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?