Steven Dwayne Bailey v. Warden

Steven Dwayne Bailey v. Warden

Petitioner:	Steven DWayne Bailey
Respondent:	Warden
Case Number:	5:2011cv01513
Filed:	September 21, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge:	Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 15, 2013	Filing 54 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)
October 2, 2012	Filing 37 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Otis D Wright, II, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Petitioners Motion for Leave to Amend be granted as to Grounds Two and Four; (2) Petitioners Motion for Leave to Amend be denied as to Grounds Three and Five; (3) within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, Respondent shall file an Amended Answer or notify the Court that he is standing on his original Answer; and (4) Petitioner may file a Reply within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the Amended Answer or the notice that Respondent is standing on his original Answer. Report and Recommendation (Issued) 34 (lmh)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 15, 2013

Filing 54 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)

October 2, 2012

Filing 37 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Otis D Wright, II, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Petitioners Motion for Leave to Amend be granted as to Grounds Two and Four; (2) Petitioners Motion for Leave to Amend be denied as to Grounds Three and Five; (3) within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, Respondent shall file an Amended Answer or notify the Court that he is standing on his original Answer; and (4) Petitioner may file a Reply within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the Amended Answer or the notice that Respondent is standing on his original Answer. Report and Recommendation (Issued) 34 (lmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steven Dwayne Bailey v. Warden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By:	Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven DWayne Bailey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?