Penny Peltier Ochoa v. Paulette Durand Miele et al
| Penny Peltier Ochoa |
| Sunlan-020105 LLC, Kenneth J Miele and Paulette Durand Barkley |
| 5:2012cv00663 |
| May 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
JUDGMENT by Judge John A Kronstadt, In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate 27 Judge filed herein, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice as to the two remaining defendants (i.e., Kenneth J. Miele and Sunlan-020105, LLC). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A Kronstadt for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 21 : IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (I) Commissioner Durand-Barkley's Motion to Dismiss is granted; and (2) plaintiff's claims against Commissioner Durand-Barkley are dismissed without leave to amend. (rla)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block: IT IS ORDERED that, on or before September 24, 2012, plaintiff shall show good cause, if there be any, why service of process was not effectuated on defendants Miele, the City of Riverside, and Sunlan-020105 within the 120-day period and why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice as to those defendants for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff shall attempt to show such cause by filing a declaration, signed by plaintiff under penal ty of perjury. For any of these other three defendants as to whom plaintiff does not timely file such a declaration or fails to show good cause for her failure to timely serve, the Court intends to recommend that the action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
