Mario Alberto Valenzuela v. Randy Grounds

Respondent: Randy Grounds
Petitioner: Mario Alberto Valenzuela
Case Number: 5:2013cv00246
Filed: February 7, 2013
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Victor B. Kenton
Presiding Judge: Virginia A. Phillips
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 19, 2014 38 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, Related to: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 , R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 37 , Report and Recommendation (Issued) 34 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mario Alberto Valenzuela v. Randy Grounds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randy Grounds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mario Alberto Valenzuela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.