Krisfalusi v. Vision Marketing & Distribution Limited et al
| Cameron Krisfalusi |
| Vision Marketing & Distribution Limited and Nigel Butler |
| 5:2013cv00617 |
| April 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Justin L. Quackenbush |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE by Judge Justin L. Quackenbush, Related to: Stipulation and Order 27 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (adu)
|
|
Filing
18
PARTIAL JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Justin L. Quackenbush. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the claims in the Complaint (ECF No. 1) asserted against DEFENDANT NIGEL BUTLER are DISMISSED without prejudice and without cos ts or attorneys fees to any party. There being no just reason for delay, the court enters this FINAL JUDGMENT pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 54(b) dismissing the claims asserted in the Complaint against Defendant Butler, without prejudice and without attorn eys fees or costs to any party. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing by no later than September 20, 2013 why the Defendants Motion to Dismiss should not be granted and/or the remainder of this action be dismissed for failure to comply with the courts Order and lack of prosecution. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/20/2013. (mrgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
