Steven Hall v. K Person
Petitioner: Steven Hall
Respondent: K Person
Case Number: 5:2014cv00729
Filed: April 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Fernando M. Olguin
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION 1 FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST, PROSECUTE AND FOLLOW COURT ORDERS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court finds that it is appropriate to dismiss the Petition for lack of exhaustion, and for failure to prosecute and comply with Court orders. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. **See Order for further details.** Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ch)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steven Hall v. K Person
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: K Person
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?