Jose Gomez v. State of California et al
| Jose Gomez |
| Dr Root, Kamala Harris, Brown, Jeff Beard and State of California |
| 5:2014cv01493 |
| July 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| George H. Wu |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/5/2015. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before January 5, 2015, Petitioner shall show cause why the court should not recommend dismissal of the petition without prejudice based on his failure to exhaust administrative remedies in California. (See Order for Details.) (mp)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On September 8, 2014, Petitioner filed a first amended petition (FAP). The July 30, 2014 order to show cause (Dkt. No. 4) is DISCHARGED. However, based on the FAP, it still appears that th e one-year statute of limitations has expired. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before October 22, 2014, Petitioner shall show cause why the court should not recommend dismissal of the petition based on expiration of the one-year statute of limit ations. If Petitioner fails to respond to the order to show cause by the above deadline, the court will recommend that the petition be dismissed with prejudice based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (See Order for details.) (mp)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg.On July 21, 2014, Petitioner filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, it appears that the one-year statute of limitations has e xpired. The court, therefore, orders Petitioner to show cause, on or before August 29, 2014, why this court should not recommend dismissal of the petition with prejudice based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before August 29, 2014, Petitioner shall show cause why the court should not recommend dismissal of the petition based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (See Order for details.) (mp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
