Inland Empire Waterkeeper et al v. Maruhachi Ceramics of America, Inc. et al
| Inland Empire Waterkeeper and Orange County Coastkeeper |
| Maruhachi Ceramics of America, Inc. and Delilah Properties, Inc. |
| 5:2014cv01525 |
| July 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Environmental Matters |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
CONSENT DECREE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : Consent Decree is entered into by and between Plaintiffs Orange County Coastkeeper and Inland Empire Waterkeeper and defendants Maruhachi Ceramics of America, Inc., and Delilah Properties, Inc. Defendants agree to contribute to Waterkeepers review of information and monitoring of compliance with this Consent Decree in the amount of $5,000.00 per year, for the term of this Consent Decree, for a total of $10,000.00. Defendants agree to make a payment of $17,500.00 to the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment to fund environmental project activities that will benefit the Southern California Bight and its tributaries. Defendants shall pay a total of $45,000.00 to Plaintiffs to partially reimburse Plaintiffs for their investigation fees, expert/consultant fees and costs, and reasonable attorneys fees.(SEE DOCUMENT FOR OTHER SPECIFICS, INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS) ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
