Richard Acosta v. Audrey King et al
| Richard Acosta |
| Stephen Mayberg, Audrey King, Cliff Allenby, Pam Ahlin and Tom Voss |
| 5:2014cv02113 |
| October 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that if plaintiff objects to the transfer of this action to the United States District Co urt for the EDCA, he shall file any such Objections within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. The objections shall show cause, if any, why this action should not be transferred to the EDCA on the grounds specified above. The failure timely to file any such objections will be construed as consent to the transfer of this action to the EDCA. (lom)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. IT IS ORDERED that if plaintiff objects to the transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the EDCA, he shall file any such objections within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. See order for details. (hr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
