YUNLONG U.S.A. WINDOW FASHIONS, INC. v. Ivan Lourido et al
| YUNLONG U.S.A. WINDOW FASHIONS, INC. |
| Blackstone Window Coverings, Inc. and Ivan Lourido |
| 5:2014cv02416 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margaret M. Morrow |
| Sheri Pym |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, in favor of YUNLONG U.S.A. WINDOW FASHIONS, INC. against Blackstone Window Coverings, Inc., Ivan Lourido: On May 26, 2015, the court entered an order granting plaintiffs Yunglong U.S.A Window Fash ions, Inc.'s ("Yunglong") motion for entry of default judgment against defendants Ivan Lourido and Blackstone Window Coverings, Inc. (d/b/a Window-Shade Distributors) ("defendants"). Consequently, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. That Yunglong recover $38,795.17 on its breach of contract and open book account claims from defendants; 2. That Yunlong recover $9,272 in prejudgment interest from defendants; 3. That Yunlong recover $3,484.03 in attorneys fees from defendants; and 4. That the action be, and is hereby, dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/17/2015. (ah)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/7/2015. (ah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
