Delia Rodriguez v. Carolyn W Colvin

Delia Rodriguez v. Carolyn W Colvin

Plaintiff:	Delia Rodriguez
Defendant:	Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number:	5:2014cv02573
Filed:	December 16, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge:	Josephine L. Staton
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 25, 2015	Filing 12 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 11 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jtil)
April 23, 2015	Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block: The Corut forewarned plaintiff that the failure to effectuate proper service within one hundred and twenty (120) days after the filing of the Complaint might result in the dismissal of this cas e. The 120-day period lapsed on April 15, 2015, and no proof of service has yet been filed. Thus, it appears that the Commissioner has not yet been properly served. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that, on or before May 15, 2015, plaintiff shall show good cause, if there by any, why proper service was not made within the 120-day period and why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. (lwag)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 25, 2015

Filing 12 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 11 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jtil)

April 23, 2015

Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block: The Corut forewarned plaintiff that the failure to effectuate proper service within one hundred and twenty (120) days after the filing of the Complaint might result in the dismissal of this cas e. The 120-day period lapsed on April 15, 2015, and no proof of service has yet been filed. Thus, it appears that the Commissioner has not yet been properly served. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that, on or before May 15, 2015, plaintiff shall show good cause, if there by any, why proper service was not made within the 120-day period and why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. (lwag)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Delia Rodriguez v. Carolyn W Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delia Rodriguez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?