Roger Mihay v. Ez-Flo International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Roger Mihay
Defendant: Ez-Flo International, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2015cv00411
Filed: March 5, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David T. Bristow
Presiding Judge: Virginia A. Phillips
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/15/2016. (See document for specifics.) (iva)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roger Mihay v. Ez-Flo International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ez-Flo International, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher H Doyle
Represented By: Michael John Hassen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Mihay
Represented By: Gregory F Coleman
Represented By: Eric H Gibbs
Represented By: Dylan Hughes
Represented By: Steven Augustine Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?